Regional
Enough Western Bad Faith! Guilt Cannot Be Weaponized against the Guiltless
![image](webadmin/images/WhatsApp-Image-2021-03-18-at-11.24.19.jpeg-20210319105155000000.jpeg)
A few days
ago, Jeffrey Smith, an American “pro-democracy” researcher in Africa,
attributed Rwandan development to the country’s “weaponizing” of the west’s “guilt over the genocide”. This
narrative is nothing new, but it has always been disgraceful. It originates from
Professor Filip Reyntjens, the genocide ideologue of
the Hutu Power regime. Naturally, the intellectually-challenged claim is both
logically inconsistent and ahistorical.
Here’s why.
For one thing, the idea that the west has guilt over its
historical interaction with Africa in general and Rwanda in particular is
absurd. It presupposes noble intentions driven by a conscience to which guilt
is possible. This is widely contradicted by the conscienceless horrors of
slavery, imperialism and colonisation. Without a conscience, guilt is not
possible, and one cannot weaponize something that
doesn’t exist.
This reasoning is only possible from the perspective of
imperialist self-righteousness and education curricula that asks pupils to list the “advantages of slavery and
colonialism,” for instance. There are no
advantages to oppression. There are no advantages to genocide either. The
groundless, invalid and cruel depiction of genocide survivors as manipulators
weaponizing an imaginary empathy the west claims to have for Africans should
ideally not be honoured and dignified with a response. I say this because I
worry that responding to such ridiculous claims would legitimize them, like
explaining why the earth cannot possibly be flat could deem the Flat Earth
Theory worthy of intellectual attention.
However, the truth is that the mechanisms of colonization and
westernization masquerading as globalization have granted perceived credibility
to any white graduate who fancies a say on African political affairs. I write
for the Rwandans – and other Africans – who may not believe the poor-sport
attacks on their development or moral codes but deserve reassurance that their
objectivity was never compromised.
The west has played the “self-victimizing” role for centuries
with the intention to shift the blame of oppression to the oppressed. In light
of this, I strongly contend that the words of the west’s army of Rwanda-bashing
provocateurs should be entirely undeserving of a response, if this propaganda
was entirely harmless. It is not. There is nothing objective, founded or fair
about Smith’s words. They are merely a pseudo-rational condemnation of Rwanda’s
decades of efforts towards survival, development and peace. Rwandans, and
Africans, therefore, mustn’t let the shamefulness of such words go unmentioned.
A Strange
Truth-Warping Pathology
I’m sometimes puzzled by western narcissism. It has been
difficult not to notice the avalanche of misinformation on the Rwandan
leadership, justice system and democracy, which has
recently gushed from western publications and the social media posts of
Rusesabagina sympathizers. “Experts on Rwanda” from the Global North have
been pulling out vintage tactics from the dusty genocide denial drawer. One,
preconized by French politicians in the wake of the 1994 Genocide against the
Tutsi, suggests that every Rwandan party involved, from the killed to the
killers, bears a degree of fault for the atrocities. It says nothing about
French responsibility, certainly because a guiltless and revisionist narrative
supported by the West cannot apportion blame to a white nation.
However, there are too many relevant quotes from French
officials to demonstrate the absence of guilt: President François Mitterrand’s
early proclamation of the double-genocide theory, “De quel génocide,
parlez-vous, monsieur? De celui des Hutus contre les Tutsis ou de celui
des Tutsis contre les Hutus?” (translating to
“What Genocide are you talking about, sir? The one of the Hutus against the
Tutsi or the one of the Tutsi against the Hutu?”) and Charles Pasqua’s “Monsieur, il ne faut
pas croire que le caractère horrible de ce qui s’est passé là-bas a la même
valeur pour eux et pour nous” (translating
to “Sir, one shouldn’t think that the horrible nature of what happened over
there [in Rwanda] has the same bearing for them and for us”) stand out as some
of the most memorable low points.
Unfortunately, one needn’t look too far in the past to see how
Rwanda and its current leadership have been blamed for the manner it went about
reconstructing post-genocide Rwanda. The recent tweets by Jeffrey Smith, which
accused Rwanda of using emotional manipulation to “fund” its development, are
as ridiculous as the many other preludes to denial the west has used to warp
the narrative. How can one honestly invoke “weaponized guilt” when speaking of
genocide victims unless they are battling with the idea of sympathy or empathy
for people they believe inherently unworthy of either?
Not Quite the
Center of Our World
The victim-blaming vilifying Rwandans for having a history the
west finds “uncomfortable” to confront – while heavily involved in its
unrolling – points to a misguided western claim on defining reality.
There is really nothing to weaponize. The discourse around the
genocide can never centre around the opinions of the western world for two
reasons. For one, ex-colonies do not expect sympathy, empathy or even deserved
reparations from the west ( all of which require a conscience), for we have an
awareness of colonial history and the dynamics of western dominance. Secondly,
it is Rwandan lives that were lost, Rwandan freedoms that were stolen, and
Rwandan hearts that must heal. The post-genocide dialogue aims to support
healthy Rwandan cohabitation and preserve an entire people’s dignity and
advancement. It’s a shame that the west would assume that necessary
conversation among Rwandans, or leaders of the East African region or even
Africa at large, should involve, satisfy or appease them. The western world is
not the centre, the necessary observer, nor the immaculate, blank sheet upon
which we must inscribe our truths.
When the Gacaca courts, the
much-commended community justice system that placed judgment for crimes against
Rwandans in the hands of Rwandans, were established in 2001, the west was not
coy about its disapproval. Georgette Gagnon, an ex-Africa deputy director for
Human Rights Watch, described the proceedings as “unfair” under international
fair trial standards. “It’s not following what the US would call due process,”
she argued, claims which are consistent with her peers’ articles in
major western academic publications, such as the Oxford University Press. But
following the US due process was never the objective of Gacacas, and swaying
mythical western political sentimentalism in our favour is not the focal point
of our survival.
Drawing Blood
from a Stone
The “guilt weaponizing” trope is no more than the false
characterization of “white guilt” as a legitimate western burden, as opposed to
a manufactured privilege. Colonialism and global westernization are both
erected on white supremacist ideologies,
which proclaim the intellectual and moral superiority of the white race.
Self-righteousness and guilt cannot cohabitate. If a fight between the two ever
pinched the hearts of western political leaders, self-righteousness most likely
always won, for Africans have never received financial compensation, stolen artwork repatriation or
even a genuine apology after the exploitation, pillage and mass murders of
colonization. Western self-righteousness is present at every turn, through the
jaundiced critiques of our democratic processes, through international courts’
tendency to assert their “competence” only when it comes to trying African
leaders for crimes against Africans, and certainly, through the prejudiced
rhetoric they spew online to mislead the global public (such as the one
regurgitated by Jeffrey Smith, whose livelihood seems predicated on
pathologizing Africa and Africans – for which he is the cure-all)
Guilt Has Been
a Weapon of the West
Western familiarity with guilt weaponizing stems from their own
tactics to manipulate African political and economic systems. From establishing
colonial debt to strong-handing Africans into implementing Structural
Adjustment Programmes, the Global North has persistently shamed African
countries for bearing the wounds of their oppression and foisted on us their
exploitative policies as the solution to our “incompetence”. They have
infantilized African leadership and justified their patronizing interference by
labelling us incapable of governing ourselves. Guilt and shame are the weapons
of the west, and the west has untiringly brandished them to enrich its
countries and reinforce its supremacy. But as with every manipulation attempt,
the deceitful words of the disingenuous have only as much influence as we grant
them by continuing to doubt our known truths. Rwandan dialogue around its traumatic
past will never be directed at the west or centred around their opinions.
Therefore, the west can keep its mythical guilt to itself.
Africans don’t need it!
Source: Pan African Review