Regional
Rusesabagina's lawyers, family resort to lies about torture
Desperate times require desperate measures, they say.
After
unsuccessfully trying all tricks in the book to have terror suspect Paul
Rusesabagina released, his family and PR machine came up with a fictitious
scheme alleging that he was subjected to extreme torture including being held
in solitary confinement for more than 260 days.
Rusesabagina, a
former hotelier, is now on trial in Rwanda where he
faces nine counts linked to terrorism. Among others, he and his co-accused were
allegedly involved in terror attacks on Rwandan soil between 2018 and 2019
which claimed nine lives.
The bizarre claims by his support base were made during a
virtual press conference organised a couple of days ago by Kitty Kurth,
President of Kurth Lampe Worldwide Ideas, a spokesperson of the Paul
Rusesabagina Hotel Rwanda Foundation (PRHRF), his American and Canadian
lawyers, and three of his eldest children.
These allegations
of torture are serious. At the beginning of this planned stunt, Professor Brian
Endless, claims that Rusesabagina was abducted from his home in the US and not
in Dubai as he himself alleged, and then drugged, shackled, and taken to
Kigali.
But during trial,
the Court heard how Bishop Constantin Niyomwungeri tricked Rusesabigina into coming to Kigali to
be apprehended because he had been shocked by his terrorist activities.
Niyomwungeri revealed that he had to lie to Rusesabagina about the jet’s
destination to get him apprehended. Besides Rusesabagina who thought that the
plane was heading to Burundi, the pilot and cabin crew knew they were flying to
Kigali.
However,
Rusesabagina’s PR machine claimed that Rwanda violated the US law in abducting
one of its residents to create uproar within the State Department and other
government institutions. But this lie is not going to work.
The most
extraordinary allegation made by Endless is that during his first days of
detention, Rusesabagina was held in an “abattoir” where he could hear screams
from prisoners, including women, who would cry for help till their voices died
down.
Fact is that
Rusesabagina was held at Remera Police Station in Kigali before he was produced
in court and television footage is available showing a smiling Rusesabagina
being interviewed from his room which had a bed and mosquito next. Rusesabagina
told reporters that he had had pasta for dinner.
Allegations that
Rusesabagina had his arms and legs tied up, his nose and mouth tied and that a
soldier put his boot on his neck - a method akin to the US police choke and
hold practice - are far fetched too.
Contrary to the claim that he was detained in solitary confinement,
those who know his prison cell testify that it's more of a VIP facility than a
place fit for a terrorist suspect.
Professor Phil
Clark, Lecturer at SOAS University in London questions why Rusesabagina’s
friends changed their story. “Why their story changed (first he was bound,
drugged onto flight in Dubai, which court debunked, then claimed this occurred
on tarmac in Kigali)? Why have they waited for 300 days to allege torture and
solitary confinement?” Clark commented in a tweet.
Analysts believe
that resorting to these torture fabrications, Rusesabagina’s lawyers and family
want to attract the media and the outside world’s attention and divert them
from the damning evidence collected from the Belgian Prosecutor’s Office and
the FBI, testimonies of the 20 co-accused, and key witnesses including a
prominent US scholar Professor Michelle Martin who worked as a volunteer at
Rusesabagina’s foundation.
It was revealed
that the lawyers and family members of Rusesabagina used these unverified
claims of torture to write to the State Department, and the UN Rapporteur on
torture so that they ramp up pressure on the government of Rwanda for
Rusesabagina to be released and returned to Belgium or the US.
Despite
Rusesabagina’s antics in withdrawing from attending the trials a couple of
months ago, and the subsequent theatrics by his lawyers and family, the trial
is going on. And it will conclude when everyone involved is heard.
It is worth
recalling that these trials are held in the glare of the media both national
and international, as well as diplomats based in Kigali and is aired through
different social media outlets and television channels. This request for the
release of Rusesabagina makes a mockery of the plight of the victims of the
terrorist acts committed by his armed militias, the Front for National
Liberation, who were completely ignored during more than an hour of his
family's virtual press conference.
Was it also a coincidence that during the Q&A, the organisers selectively chose questions favourable to their false narrative like the well-known genocide denier Peter Verlinden?
They claim that Rusesabagina
cannot be visited and his fundamental rights to choose his lawyers were denied.
But he had two Rwandan lawyers of his choice before he stopped attending the
hearings when evidence against him became overwhelming.
The fact that the
Rwanda Bar Association denied Rusesabagina’s foreign lawyers accreditation to
work in Rwanda is understandable. It is the same situation with Rwandan
barristers. They cannot just go to work anywhere in Europe or the US without
following proper protocols.
As for the
falsehood of solitary confinement, Rusesabagina has been visited by the Belgian
representation in Rwanda and he can be visited upon request and in accordance
with existing rules. The latest move by Rusesabagina’s PR machine underscores
the misjudgment of Rwanda’s resolve to see that justice is done in this trial.
No matter how
pushy, or how long they keep recycling the same lies, the law will take its
course to deliver a fair trial to Rusesabagina, and justice to the victims of
his terror activities.