International
What global north media should learn from Rwanda visit by UK Royalty
![image](webadmin/images/image.jpg-20220626072914000000.jpg)
The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of
Cornwall, Charles and Camilla, respectively, attended the Commonwealth Heads of
Government meeting (CHOGM), in Rwanda.
The UK Royals represented Queen Elizabeth II of
The United Kingdom, who is the head of the Commonwealth. On their second day in
Rwanda, they visited the Kigali genocide memorial. At the memorial, they left a
message: “We remember all the victims of the 1994 genocide against the
Tutsi. The Kigali memorial is the final
resting place for more than 250,000 of the approximately 1 million victims of
the genocide.”
The first lesson in the above statement from
the British Royals, for the global north media, especially the UK media, and
politicians, is the value of respect.
More than one million people were killed during
the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi.
But the
UK media and the rest of the global north prefer their own invented figures of
800,000 people. This is done purposely, ignoring that Rwandans are the ones who
know better how many people died.
On every village there are survivors who gave
account of their beloved ones and neighbors who perished and that’s how the more
than one million aggregate estimate was arrived at. For the UK media and much
of the global north to say the contrary, it means that they lack respect for
the Rwandan people. They take Rwandans as liars who are exaggerating the
figures of genocide victims. This is an insult and disrespect to millions of
Rwandans.
Secondly, His Royal Highness, the Prince of
Wales, used the right terminology by recognizing that what happened in Rwanda, in
1994, was, “the genocide against the Tutsi,” and not ‘the Rwandan genocide’ as
the UK media prefers to call it.
Despite the fact that the United Nations
General Assembly designated 7th April as the International day of
Reflection on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, UK media and
politicians decide to use some other vague naming as they deny and trivialise
the genocide against the Tutsi.
The pretext of using the terminology of ‘the Rwandan
genocide’ recognizes the claim by
genocide perpetrators and deniers who fight hard to “balance the equation” that
even the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) which stopped the Genocide also killed
the Hutu.
‘The Rwandan genocide’ terminology therefore,
creates ambiguity and obscures the truth.
Easily put, saying the ‘Rwandan genocide’ is
another way of believing that there was double genocide in Rwanda, yet this has
never been possible in any other part of the world. Those who were targeted to be wiped out were
the Tutsi, hence the right naming as the genocide against the Tutsi. The terminology
of “the Rwandan genocide”, used by the UK media aids genocide deniers and
revisionists to distort historical facts surrounding the genocide against the
Tutsi.
Prince Charles and Camilla also travelled out
of Kigali, the Rwandan capital, to visit women survivors of the genocide
against the Tutsi. They visited Ntarama genocide memorial as well as the
reconciliation village in Mbyo, where genocide victims and perpetrators live
together. The royals twitted: “… reconciliation villages, such as Mbyo, help to
build the resilience needed for Rwanda to leave the past in history and for
communities to live together.”
Again, the message by the royals, showed
humility, empathy and love, unlike UK media
coverage that gives genocide deniers and perpetrators space to dance on
the graves of genocide victims.
Most UK journalists write about Rwanda from the
comfort of their newsrooms and out of touch with the reality. Most depend on
hearsay by Rwandan critics. The royals travelled all the way on dusty roads to
have a personal experience and listen to the real voices of victims. They could
have stayed in the comfort of their hotel and asked someone to tell them the
story about the reconciliation village. They did not.
The infamous BBC documentary, “Rwanda the
Untold Story,” produced by Jane
Corbin, and several other stories that minimize the 1994 genocide against the
Tutsi, showed lack of a human heart and double standards by UK media houses which
cannot dare host people who deny the Holocaust,
or host people with the neo-Nazi
ideology.
Freedom of
speech and expression claimed to be practiced by UK and the global north media
should not be at the expense of losing humanness. The UK media keeps opening
the wounds of millions of Rwandans’ hearts which are still bleeding, and the
sensibilities of what happened to Rwandans cannot be judged by others. Give them a chance to heal
gradually.
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson also visited
the genocide memorial. He had this to say: “It has been utterly shocking to see
these images and so many physical memorials of the appalling and inexplicable
genocide against the Tutsi. I would like to thank my hosts here in Kigali for
bringing it home to me, with such clarity and horror. We must do everything we
can to ensure that human hearts never again are allowed to breed such hatred.”
UK politicians and the global north media can
do much better.
Thank you to The Prince of Wales and The
Duchess of Cornwall. Thank you to Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
Thank you for showing your humility, respect
and love to the Rwandan people.