Opinion
When Western media attacks Kagame know Rwanda is doing well
![image](webadmin/images/Official-Portrait--scaled.jpeg-20210620103052000000.jpeg)
Rwandan President Paul
Kagame is undoubtedly one of the most inspiring Presidents on the African
continent even among his peers. Kagame is a role model who turned Rwanda from
the brink of a failed state to one of the best performing countries on the
continent. However, in the Western media, stories about Kagame are the opposite
of what he actually stands for.
When one reads headlines by
The New York Times, The Guardian, BBC and VOA, the Rwandan President is called all sorts of names; autocratic,
dictator, human rights violator, media predator, and many more, yet the same
media houses cannot use similar names referring to Western leaders.
Kagame has not been in
the good books of Western countries for different reasons. First of all, he led
a rebel movement that overthrew a regime that had the ‘legitimate’ support of
superpowers. The Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA) considered ill equipped and
poorly trained won a war against giants without any superpower godfather. This
was the first crime. France was there to defend the government that committed
the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi, but ended up being pushed, along with the
defeated genocidal army, into Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo).
In post-colonial Africa,
the West used media as a weapon against governments considered as not playing
by their ‘rule book,’ in order to shape Western narrative to influence
geopolitics, people’s perception and thinking, with an ultimate goal of causing
regime change. The West's foreign policy
towards weak states is to replace leaders they do not want by any means
possible. The West minds about their interests, not what the leader will deliver
to his or her people.
Western media campaign against Rwanda
When BBC and VOA started
broadcasting programs in Kinyarwanda, the aim was not to help people in the
Great Lakes understand better what happens in the region. It was to shape the
narrative. It was to give voice to the defeated army that committed genocide.
It was to give voice to genocide suspects to deny what they had done and
instead blame it on Kagame and the RPF. Currently, it is Western media that is
on the forefront of genocide denial and trying to re-write Rwandan history. It
is not surprising, therefore, that BBC and VOA are sponsored by countries that
still deny calling the genocide against the Tutsi by its real name, despite a
resolution by the UN designating April
7, every year, as the International Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide
against the Tutsi.
Secondly, Kagame’s
leadership that is charting its own political and development path without
subscribing to the Western ‘rule book,’ goes against the neo-colonial
agenda. “Even those who criticize Kagame
know very well that he has done miracles for his country and his people. But
they simply mention the achievements in passing and jump to all sorts of
allegations peddled by genocide deniers, and fugitives so that the people of Rwanda
can hate him and his government,” an African diplomat once noted.
Kagame’s success is not
credited to them; it defeats the neo-colonialism agenda. If all African leaders
think like him, the West will no-longer exploit Africa. Kagame therefore, has to
be demonized by the West to stop his ‘bad’ influence.
Rwanda is not a perfect state. It has its own challenges that it keeps on improving. Managing a post genocide country is on its own a challenge that can only be well understood by Kagame and his government rather than critics. But when Western media gives a platform to genocide suspects and people who fell out with Kagame, they become a mouthpiece for such people. Western media amplifies the few voices out there to sound like the country is facing a leadership crisis. What they forget is that the people who gave Kagame the mandate and legitimacy are the majority and live in Rwanda and are the ones who know their President better, not outsiders and criminal suspects.
Giving voice to criminals and their supporters
Foreigners like Michella
Wrong, Judi Rever, Anjan Sundaram, Jane Corbin and others, are given space by
Western media to deny genocide and accuse Kagame and the RPF government of
killing the Hutu, yet no Holocaust denier can be praised and given a platform
by Western media. But because it is about Africa, because it is Rwanda, it does
not matter.
Paul Rusesabagina who is
facing terrorism charges - and some evidence is held by FBI and Belgian police
- could not be extradited to Rwanda for trial. When Rwanda uses the same means
Western countries use to lure criminals into arrest, the blame starts but
silence is kept on precedents. The West rule book seems to suggest to Kagame,
“do as we say but do not do as we do.”
Kagame has refused to listen
to this, which is another crime. Victoire Ingabire who was released from prison
on presidential pardon for genocide negation and double genocide claims is
painted by Western media as a "fierce critic and politician.” Knowing that
the genocide against the Tutsi was caused by ethnic division and discrimination
applied by the colonialists, the Belgians, and the post-independence
government, one wonders which country on earth can allow people like Ingabire
to form political parties.
Western media like the
BBC has been used as a propaganda tool to tell lies and deceptions since WWII.
Even before WWII, around the 1930s, BBC conducted transnational broadcasting to
promote Britain’s diplomacy (read deceptive influence) in times of rising international
tension and conflict. In fact, BBC can be viewed as the mother of present day
fake news.
In the US, mainstream
media like VOA, Washington Post, The New York Times, lost ethical conduct and credibility by
serving the interests of their paymasters. In 2003, for example, US media
falsely supported policy makers to claim Iraq had stockpiles of weapons of mass
destruction.
Saddam Hussein was
summarily killed and Iraq was destroyed. The partisan coverage of presidential
elections by US media buries the truth. Peter Vanderwicken, the editor of Vanderwicken's Financial
Digest, wrote in the Harvard
Business Review, in an article titled “why the News Is not the Truth,”
observing that, “The U.S.
press, like the U.S. government, is a corrupt and troubled institution. Corrupt
not so much in the sense that it accepts bribes but in a systemic sense. It
fails to do what it claims to do, what it should do, and what society expects
it to do.” This tells us, therefore, that the so called freedom of Western media
is simply illusionary and deceptive. People should not be surprised therefore,
when they tell lies about Kagame and the RPF. It is within their policy to do
so in promoting the wishes of their paymasters if they don’t want Kagame and
the RPF government.
Democracy and human rights
Democracy
and human rights too are used as weapons to destroy the image of leaders who do
not subscribe to their ‘rule book’ which is applied with double standards. Freedom House rates Rwanda at 22
points out of 100 (Freedom in the World 2020 report) on people’s access to
political rights and civil liberties.
Some of
the Western indicators on democracy and human rights applied to African
countries or on Rwanda in particular, are not applicable or simply irrelevant.
For example, to measure human rights by people who take to the streets to
demonstrate does not represent the Rwandan culture. When Rwandans are aggrieved
they do not shout on the streets carrying posters. They seek dialogue. This is
within Rwandan culture and tradition. This is why Rwanda re-invented Gacaca
courts in modern times, to deal with genocide cases as both restorative and
participatory justice.
Again,
given the history and contextual realities of Rwanda, the RPF government opted
for consensual democracy rather than confrontational politics. One of the
weaknesses of the West is assuming that their democracy is superior and they
have to impose it on others. Democracy with Rwandan characteristics is working
well for the Rwandan people and they do not have to copy from the West. There
is no one size fit all model of democracy.
Kagame’s
leadership moves millions of Rwandan people out of poverty. More than 90
percent of Rwandans have universal healthcare. The government spends Rwf75
billion in four years to improve the dignity and self-worth of elderly persons.
All citizens get Covid-19 testing and vaccination at no cost. By 2024 all
Rwandans expect to have access to electricity. The list is long. If all this is
not about human rights, then one wonders what it is! If Kagame is a dictator
and he delivers all this to the Rwandan people, then I would prefer to be under
such dictatorship than in a democracy that delivers nothing.
Dignity and self-worth
These are values that the
West believes cannot be pursued by poor countries and Kagame does not believe
this. Even the poor deserve respect and equality as human beings. When Kagame
refused the US condition of importing second hand clothes in order to qualify
for export free quota, he chose to lose the benefits of the Africa Opportunity
Act (AGOA) than surrendering the dignity of his people. Rwandans should not
wear secondhand rejects from rich countries. Some choices to emancipate
Rwandans have a price to pay. Kagame will not be liked for this because the
West will lose business but Rwanda will develop her own textile industries.
The Rwandan model
In 2016, the African
Union (AU) entrusted Kagame to lead reforms to make the continental body more
efficient and productive towards achieving its Agenda 2063. The African leaders
chose him because of his track record of transforming Rwanda into one of the most
well governed and developing countries on the continent. As a Pan Africanist,
Kagame recently argued for the building of Africa’s capacity to produce
high-quality medicines and vaccines in Africa. His statement came at a time
Western countries are hording Covid-19 vaccines and refusing to grant patent
rights for the manufacture of the vaccines in Africa because they will not make
enough profits. By Kagame calling for
Africa’s self–reliance, he automatically steps on toes of the imperial agenda.
Kagame cannot escape harassment by the Western media.
The African continent
cannot rely on someone who is a dictator, a human rights violator, and so on,
to lead African Union reforms. These are lies and deceptions created by the
west to keep Africans in shackles of dependency. Kagame is paying the price for
championing a new model for Rwanda and Africa’s total liberation.
The story of Ousman Touray
Ousman Touray is a young
and brilliant undergraduate from Gambia who had an opportunity to study his
master’s degree program in Western countries. When you hear his story that went
viral in African media platforms, then you will understand that Kagame is a
role model and inspiration to many African youth.
Ousman refused offers of
scholarships to attend Western universities but preferred to study in Rwanda!
Reason? The Rwandan development model is successful and more relevant to his
country than the far West. Kagame has given hope to young Africans whose
mindset looked at the West as the only land of opportunity than their mother
continent. Kagame’s influence, hated by the West, is loved by millions of
Africans and well-wishers.
When Kagame is attacked
by Western media and human rights organizations, it is not because of what they
want him to appear to be. It is because of the good things he is doing for
Rwanda yet its detractors consider bad for their own selfish interests.
Ancient Greek
Philosopher, Aristotle, said there is only one way to avoid criticism: do
nothing, say nothing, and be nothing. Kagame chose to do something.
An African diplomat once
told me that if Africa had more Kagames it would develope within one
generation. Therefore, when Western
media attacks Kagame, just know that Rwanda is doing well and his image is the
price.