Regional
Can UK media go to Kigali and report that the first Asylum seeker is safe in Rwanda?
Local and international media have reported that the first
UK asylum seeker arrived in Rwanda. He was reported to be of African origin. He
personally requested for relocation to Rwanda.
The UK Business Secretary, Kemi Badenoch, told the media
that she knew Rwanda as a holiday destination with many people going there.
This put to shame critics who have been flooding the UK media with the
narrative that Rwanda is not a safe country.
Badenoch noted that migrants are volunteering to pack their
bags and head to the holiday destination of Kigali, adding that, "we need
to get away from a lot of the myths about this African country which is
actually a leader on the continent in terms of what it is been able to achieve
both economically and around law and order."
Since April 2022, when the governments of the UK and Rwanda
announced a new Migration and Economic Development Partnership (MEDP), the UK
media began a coordinated campaign against Rwanda, with biased narratives of
the country being “undemocratic, lack of human rights and generally being
unsafe” for UK asylum seekers relocation.
UK media editors filed reports based on hearsay without
setting foot in Rwanda, as well as basing their reporting on biased sources. It
looked more of a political conspiracy meant to tarnish the image of Rwanda,
sounding drums that call on the UK government to abandon the asylum seekers
partnership, and to the international community to isolate Rwanda.
Now that their project has failed flat, can the UK media
editors bite their humble pie and embark on reporting professionally by
traveling to Kigali to assess the safety of asylum seekers?
This time, instead of relying on what others told them, the
editors will interview the asylum seekers themselves to understand the reality
about their safety.
Rwanda and UK partnered to stop a dangerous global
migration crisis that has not been solved through conventional means. Critics
to the new and innovative approach never provided any other alternative.
The failure of the UK media campaign to stop their
government from relocating asylum seekers to Rwanda is clear evidence that the
truth prevailed; first of all on the validity of the deal, and secondly, on the
safety of asylum seekers in Rwanda.
Rwanda is a small country in terms of geographical size,
but its leadership has a big mind and a big heart. Unlike the genocidal regime
that denied thousands of refugees to return home, claiming that the country is
as full as a glass of water, the RPF-led government of Rwanda has opened its
doors to all asylum seekers and refugees irrespective of their origin. The
little that Rwanda has can be shared to avert human suffering. This is the
reason why some profit minded souls should take time to understand how Rwanda
works.
Rwanda is commonly referred to as a country of a thousand
hills. But again, today, it is also known as a country with a thousand
solutions.
The 1994 genocide against the Tutsi that befell the country
was stopped by Rwandans, at a time when the international community that had all
the means to do so looked aside.
This was a big lesson for the country; to always take the
lead to solve her own problems and also be there for others in time of critical
need.
It is not the first time that Rwanda has employed an
unconventional approach to solve big challenges.
After the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi, over 120,000
genocide suspects crowded in prisons that were built for less numbers and
trying them using the classic judicial system, their cases would take hundreds
of years.
Rwanda resorted to a traditional judicial process known as
“Gacaca”, a system that was not understood by the West and highly criticized
through their media. Gacaca courts speeded up the cases, decongested the
prisons, and served to promote reconciliation by providing a means for victims
to learn the truth about the death of their family members. Same story as the
UK-Rwanda partnership which is also unconventional.
Rwanda is a country that has registered tremendous progress
against all odds. In a period of 30 years, through strategically thinking out
of the box to make sense where seems to be no sense at all, so much has been
achieved. Only big minds with “Ubuntu” can understand the driving force behind
Rwanda’s unique success story.
Hundreds of asylum seekers go through difficult routes in the Sahara Desert and remote border areas. One of the primary objectives of the Rwanda-UK asylum seekers deal is to stop such unfortunate human suffering and deaths. If the UK media worked in the interest of stopping this kind of human misery, it would say thank you to Rwanda for your generous love for humanity and being part of the solution to stop the dangerous boats.